[ v15 p281 ]
15:0281(62)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
15 FLRA No. 62 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 2667 Union and EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Agency Case No. O-AR-292 DECISION This matter is before the Authority on an exception to the award of Arbitrator James M. Harkless filed by the Union under section 7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and part 2425 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations. The Agency filed an opposition. The dispute in this matter concerns the grievant's 14-day suspension on charges of failure to obey an order, insubordination, and dereliction in the performance of her assigned duties. A grievance was filed and submitted to arbitration protesting the suspension. The Arbitrator determined that the suspension was not for sufficient cause. Accordingly, he sustained the grievance, set aside the suspension, and awarded the grievant backpay for the salary that was improperly withheld by reason of the suspension. However, he denied the Union's request for an award of attorney fees because he determined that the grievant's conduct warranted an admonishment. The Union has filed an exception to the Arbitrator's denial of attorney fees. In its exception the Union contends that the denial of attorney fees is contrary to the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. 5596. Specifically, the Union argues that the award is not in accordance with the standards established under 5 U.S.C. 7701(g) regarding awards of attorney fees. Specifically, the Union maintains that the Arbitrator essentially held that an award of attorney fees was not justified because the grievant's conduct warranted an admonishment and that this ruling is inconsistent with section 7701(g)(1), which provides other criteria for determining when an award of attorney fees is warranted. Further, the Union claims that the refusal to grant attorney fees is inconsistent with the standards established under section 7701(g)(1) by the Merit Systems Protection Board which provide that an award of attorney fees is warranted when an employee is substantially innocent of charges brought against the employee or when a suspension was initiated in bad faith. In International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and United States Army Support Command, Hawaii, 14 FLRA No. 90 (1984), the Authority for the first time addressed in detail the statutory requirements regarding awards of attorney fees by arbitrators. The Authority held that under the applicable standards of the Back Pay Act, an arbitrator must provide a fully articulated, reasoned decision setting forth the specific findings supporting the determination on each pertinent statutory requirement, including the basis upon which the reasonableness of the amount was determined when fees are awarded. In this case the Arbitrator's award is not in accordance with these standards. However, the Arbitrator's determination was made without the benefit of the instruction and guidance provided by United States Army Support Command, Hawaii. Consequently, the Authority shall remand the award to the parties to have them obtain a clarification and interpretation of the determination by the Arbitrator to deny an award of attorney fees. Accordingly, pursuant to section 2425.4 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations, the award is remanded to the parties with the direction that they request, jointly or separately, that the Arbitrator clarify the award. The submission to the Arbitrator is for the limited purpose of having the Arbitrator clarify and interpret his award regarding attorney fees to articulate fully specific findings on all pertinent statutory provisions. Issued, Washington, D.C., July 17, 1984 Barbara J. Mahone, Chairman Ronald W. Haughton, Member Henry B. Frazier III, Member FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY