[ v10 p151 ]
10:0151(30)CA
The decision of the Authority follows:
10 FLRA No. 30 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, WASHINGTON, D.C. AND UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION IV, ATLANTA, GEORGIA Respondents and NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1907 Charging Party Case No. 4-CA-663 DECISION AND ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR'S "ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY" IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2429.1(A) OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS. UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE ENTIRE RECORD IN THIS CASE, INCLUDING THE STIPULATION OF FACTS AND THE CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES, THE AUTHORITY FINDS: THE COMPLAINT ALLEGES THAT BOTH RESPONDENTS VIOLATED SECTION 7116(A)(1) AND (8) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE) WHEN THEY FAILED TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 7131(A) OF THE STATUTE BY REFUSING TO REIMBURSE EMPLOYEE JOE S. THOMAS FOR HIS TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES INCURRED WHILE IN DUTY STATUS AS THE DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE UNION IN CONNECTION WITH COLLECTIVE BARGAINING NEGOTIATIONS. /1/ THE RESPONDENT AGENCY'S TRAVEL REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT A TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION MUST BE ISSUED IN ORDER TO REIMBURSE AN EMPLOYEE FOR PROSPECTIVE TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES. THOMAS' REQUEST FOR SUCH AN AUTHORIZATION WAS REFUSED BY THE RESPONDENT ACTIVITY BASED UPON THE DIRECTION OF THE RESPONDENT AGENCY. THE PARTIES AGREE THAT THOMAS PARTICIPATED IN NEGOTIATIONS ON OCTOBER 7, 8, 21, 22, 23, 28, 29 AND 30, NOVEMBER 12, 13, 18, 19, 20 AND 25, AND DECEMBER 2, 1980, AND THAT HE TRAVELED FROM HIS RESIDENCE TO THE NEGOTIATING SITE. THE ISSUE HEREIN IS SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL TO THAT FOUND IN BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS, WESTERN REGION, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, 4 FLRA NO. 40(1980), ENFORCED SUB NOM. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS V. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, 672 F.2D 732 (9TH CIR. 1982). /2/ FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN DETAIL IN BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS, THE AUTHORITY FINDS THAT THE RESPONDENT AGENCY VIOLATED SECTION 7116(A)(1) AND (8) OF THE STATUTE BY ITS DIRECTION TO THE ACTIVITY NOT TO AUTHORIZE TRAVEL AND PER DIEM FOR THOMAS, THEREBY PREVENTING THE ACTIVITY FROM COMPLYING WITH SECTION 7131(A) OF THE STATUTE. FURTHER, THE AUTHORITY FINDS THAT THE ACTIVITY HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO FOLLOW THE DIRECTIVE OF THE AGENCY AND THUS DID NOT ITSELF VIOLATE THE STATUTE. /3/ THUS, THE AUTHORITY SHALL ORDER THE RESPONDENT AGENCY TO INSTITUTE APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION AND SHALL ORDER THE COMPLAINT DISMISSED INSOFAR AS IT ALLEGES A VIOLATION OF THE STATUTE BY THE RESPONDENT ACTIVITY. ORDER /4/ PURSUANT TO SECTION 2423.29 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS AND SECTION 7118 OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE, THE AUTHORITY HEREBY ORDERS THAT THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, WASHINGTON, D.C., SHALL: 1. CEASE AND DESIST FROM: (A) DIRECTING THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION IV, ATLANTA, GEORGIA, TO REFUSE TO AUTHORIZE PAYMENT FOR PROPERLY DOCUMENTED TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES TO BE INCURRED BY EMPLOYEES AS A RESULT OF PARTICIPATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 7131(A) OF THE STATUTE AS DULY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1907, THE EMPLOYEES' EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE, IN CONNECTION WITH NEGOTIATION OF A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT. (B) IN ANY LIKE OR RELATED MANNER INTERFERING WITH, RESTRAINING, OR COERCING ITS EMPLOYEES IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR RIGHTS ASSURED BY THE STATUTE. 2. TAKE THE FOLLOWING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ORDER TO EFFECTUATE THE PURPOSES AND POLICIES OF THE STATUTE: (A) DIRECT THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION IV, ATLANTA, GEORGIA, UPON THE FILING OF A PROPERLY DOCUMENTED VOUCHER, TO REIMBURSE EMPLOYEE JOE S. THOMAS FOR HIS PER DIEM AND TRAVEL EXPENSES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF PARTICIPATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 7131(A) OF THE STATUTE AS THE DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1907, DURING THE NEGOTIATION OF A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT. (B) POST AT ITS FACILITIES IN THE OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, WASHINGTON, D.C., AND IN REGION IV, ATLANTA, GEORGIA, COPIES OF THE ATTACHED NOTICE ON FORMS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY. UPON RECEIPT OF SUCH FORMS, THEY SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, WASHINGTON, D.C., OR HER DESIGNEE AND SHALL BE POSTED AND MAINTAINED FOR 60 CONSECUTIVE DAYS THEREAFTER, IN CONSPICUOUS PLACES, INCLUDING ALL BULLETIN BOARDS AND OTHER PLACES WHERE NOTICES ARE CUSTOMARILY POSTED. THE ADMINISTRATOR SHALL TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO INSURE THAT SUCH NOTICES ARE NOT ALTERED, DEFACED, OR COVERED BY ANY OTHER MATERIAL. (C) PURSUANT TO SECTION 2423.30 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, NOTIFY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, REGION IV, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, IN WRITING, WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, AS TO WHAT STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO COMPLY HEREWITH. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE COMPLAINT IN CASE NO. 4-CA-663, INSOFAR AS IT ALLEGES A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7116(A)(1) AND (8) OF THE STATUTE BY THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION IV, ATLANTA, GEORGIA, BE, AND IT HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., SEPTEMBER 24, 1982 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES PURSUANT TO A DECISION AND ORDER OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND IN ORDER TO EFFECTUATE THE POLICIES OF CHAPTER 71 OF TITLE 5 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS WE HEREBY NOTIFY OUR EMPLOYEES THAT: WE WILL NOT DIRECT THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION IV, ATLANTA, GEORGIA, TO REFUSE TO AUTHORIZE PAYMENT FOR PROPERLY DOCUMENTED TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES TO BE INCURRED BY EMPLOYEES AS A RESULT OF PARTICIPATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 7131(A) OF THE STATUTE AS DULY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1907, THE EMPLOYEES' EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE, IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEGOTIATION OF A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT. WE WILL NOT IN ANY LIKE OR RELATED MANNER INTERFERE WITH, RESTRAIN, OR COERCE OUR EMPLOYEES IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR RIGHTS ASSURED BY THE STATUTE. WE WILL DIRECT THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION IV, ATLANTA GEORGIA, UPON THE FILING OF A PROPERLY DOCUMENTED VOUCHER, TO REIMBURSE EMPLOYEE JOE S. THOMAS FOR HIS PER DIEM AND TRAVEL EXPENSES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF HIS PARTICIPATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 7131(A) OF THE STATUTE AS THE DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1907, DURING THE NEGOTIATION OF A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT. (AGENCY) DATED: . . . BY: . . . (SIGNATURE) THIS NOTICE MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR 60 CONSECUTIVE DAYS FROM THE DATE OF POSTING AND MUST NOT BE ALTERED, DEFACED, OR COVERED BY ANY OTHER MATERIAL. IF EMPLOYEES HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE NOTICE OR COMPLIANCE WITH ITS PROVISIONS, THEY MAY COMMUNICATE DIRECTLY WITH THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, REGION IV, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, WHOSE ADDRESS IS SUITE 501 NORTH WING, 1776 PEACHTREE STREET, N.W., ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30309 AND WHOSE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS (404) 881-2324. --------------- FOOTNOTES$ --------------- /1/ THE RESPONDENTS ALLEGE THAT BECAUSE THE UNION HAD FILED A SIMILAR CHARGE (CASE NO. 4-CA-637) AND THEN WITHDREW IT WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, THE INSTANT COMPLAINT SHOULD BE DISMISSED AS MOOT. HOWEVER, A WITHDRAWAL IS PROCEDURAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT BAR A CHARGING PARTY FROM TIMELY REFILING. ALSO WITHOUT MERIT IS THE RESPONDENTS' CONTENTION THAT THE CHARGE HEREIN WAS FILED PREMATURELY BECAUSE THOMAS AFTER THE FACT HAD NOT SUBMITTED A VOUCHER SEEKING REIMBURSEMENT OF HIS EXPENSES. WHERE, AS HERE, AN AGENCY REFUSES TO AUTHORIZE REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, THE AUTHORITY WILL NOT REQUIRE THE SUBSEQUENT PERFORMANCE OF A FUTILE ACT. /2/ BUT SEE DIVISION OF MILITARY AND NAVAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF NEW YORK (ALBANY, NEW YORK), 7 FLRA NO. 69(1981), REVERSED SUB NOM. DIVISION OF MILITARY AND NAVAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF NEW YORK, AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE V. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, NO. 82-4036 (2D CIR. JUNE 28, 1982) AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SCIENCE AND EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, NORTH CENTRAL REGION, DAKOTAS-ALASKA AREA, 6 FLRA NO. 45 (1981), REVERSED SUB NOM. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE V. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, NO. 81-1948 (8TH CIR. AUGUST 9, 1982). /3/ DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, WATER AND POWER RESOURCES SERVICE, GRAND COULEE PROJECT, GRAND COULEE, WASHINGTON, 9 FLRA NO. 46(1982). /4/ THE RESPONDENTS' CONTENTION THAT THOMAS WAS DUE NO PER DIEM MORE PROPERLY BE RAISED DURING THE COMPLIANCE STAGE OF THIS PROCEEDING.