[ v09 p421 ]
09:0421(51)CA
The decision of the Authority follows:
9 FLRA No. 51 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Respondent and CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CREA), INDEPENDENT Charging Party Case No. 3-CA-582 DECISION AND ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO A REGIONAL DIRECTOR'S "ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE AUTHORITY" IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2429.1(A) OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS (5 CFR 2429.1(A)). UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE ENTIRE RECORD IN THIS CASE, INCLUDING THE PARTIES' STIPULATION OF FACTS, ACCOMPANYING EXHIBITS, AND BRIEFS SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT AND THE GENERAL COUNSEL, THE AUTHORITY FINDS: THE COMPLAINT HEREIN ALLEGES THAT THE RESPONDENT LIBRARY OF CONGRESS (LIBRARY) VIOLATED SECTION 7116(A)(1) AND (5) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE) BY REFUSING TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH WITH THE CHARGING PARTY, CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CREA), ON AND AFTER SEPTEMBER 10, 1979, CONCERNING CREA'S PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE LIBRARY'S FISCAL YEAR 1980 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN. AT ALL TIMES MATERIAL HEREIN, THE LIBRARY HAS RECOGNIZED CREA AS THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING REPRESENTATIVE OF A UNIT OF ALL PROFESSIONAL AND NONPROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES OF THE CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE, WITH THE USUAL STATUTORY EXCLUSIONS. ON JUNE 22, 1979, THE LIBRARY SUBMITTED ITS PROPOSED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1980 TO CREA. BY VIRTUE OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964, AS AMENDED, THE LIBRARY WAS REQUIRED TO HAVE ITS 1980 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN IN PLACE BY OCTOBER 1, 1979. CREA RESPONDED WITH PROPOSALS CONCERNING THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1979, AND THE PARTIES MET ON SEPTEMBER 27 AND 28, AT WHICH TIMES THE LIBRARY CONSIDERED THE UNION PROPOSALS IN GOOD FAITH, BUT DECLINED TO NEGOTIATE WITH CREA BEFORE IMPLEMENTING ITS PLAN. SINCE ON OR ABOUT SEPTEMBER 10, 1979, AND CONTINUING TO DATE, THE LIBRARY HAS REFUSED AND CONTINUES TO REFUSE TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH CONCERNING THE CREA'S PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE FISCAL YEAR 1980 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN. WHILE CONCEDING THAT PROPOSALS RELATING TO DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ARE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE DUTY TO BARGAIN UNDER THE STATUTE, /1/ AND STIPULATING AS TO ITS REFUSAL TO BARGAIN, AS STATED ABOVE, THE LIBRARY RAISES THREE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES. FIRST, THE LIBRARY CONTENDS THAT THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT, CONSISTENT WITH THEIR PAST PRACTICE, MERELY OBLIGATES THE LIBRARY TO CONFER WITH CREA ON ASPECTS OF THE LIBRARY'S AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLANS AND TO CONSIDER IN GOOD FAITH ALL PROGRAMS PROPOSED BY CREA FOR INCLUSION THEREIN, BUT DOES NOT REQUIRE THE LIBRARY TO BARGAIN WITH CREA ABOUT SUCH PROPOSED PROGRAMS. IN THIS REGARD, THE LIBRARY ASSERTS THAT ITS REFUSAL TO BARGAIN IS BASED UPON A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT, AND THEREFORE IS NOT A CLEAR UNILATERAL BREACH OF CONTRACT SO AS TO SUPPORT AN UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE FINDING BUT RATHER INVOLVES A DISPUTE OVER THE MEANING OF THE AGREEMENT WHICH IS APPROPRIATE FOR RESOLUTION BY AN ARBITRATOR. SECONDLY, IT IS ASSERTED THAT, "(W)HILE THE LIBRARY WOULD ORDINARILY BE OBLIGED TO BARGAIN WITH THE CREA ABOUT AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLANS UNDER THE STATUTE (SEE AIR FORCE LOGISTICS COMMAND, SUPRA), THE CREA HAS MADE A CLEAR AND UNMISTAKABLE WAIVER OF THIS STATUTORY RIGHT." /2/ IN THIS CONNECTION, THE LIBRARY ASSERTS THAT, BY AGREEING TO ENGAGE IN INTEREST ARBITRATION, "CREA WAIVED ANY (SUCH STATUTORY) RIGHTS WHICH MIGHT BE DIMINISHED BY (THE) ARBITRATOR . . . ." FINALLY, THE LIBRARY CONTENDS THAT ITS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1980 CONTAINED NO PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE 1979 PLAN AND THEREFORE NO DUTY TO BARGAIN EXISTED WITH RESPECT TO CHANGES PROPOSED BY THE CREA. THE AUTHORITY FINDS THAT THE CONTENTIONS SET FORTH ABOVE CANNOT BE SUSTAINED, AND THEREFORE CONCLUDES THAT THE LIBRARY'S CONCEDED REFUSAL TO BARGAIN CONCERNING A NEGOTIABLE MATTER CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7116(A)(1) AND (5) OF THE STATUTE, AS ALLEGED. THUS, AT THE TIME THAT CREA REQUESTED AND THE LIBRARY REFUSED TO NEGOTIATE CONCERNING THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1980, THERE WAS NO AGREEMENT YET IN EFFECT BETWEEN THE PARTIES. /3/ NOR DOES THE RECORD INDICATE THAT THE LIBRARY ASSERTED THE EXISTENCE OF AN AGREEMENT AS THE BASIS FOR REFUSING THE REQUEST BY CREA TO NEGOTIATE CONCERNING CHANGES IN THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1980. MOREOVER, THE LIBRARY'S APPARENT RELIANCE ON PAST PRACTICE AS THE BASIS FOR REFUSING TO BARGAIN WITH THE CREA CONCERNING THE FY 1980 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN IS SIMILARLY MISPLACED, NOTING PARTICULARLY THE PARTIES' STIPULATION THAT "(T)HE RESPONDENT NEGOTIATED WITH THE UNION OVER RESPONDENT'S PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLANS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1979 AND FISCAL YEAR 1978 . . . ." AS TO THE LIBRARY'S RELATED ARGUMENT THAT THE CREA WAIVED ITS RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE CONCERNING THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR FY 1980 BY SUBSEQUENTLY EXECUTING THE AGREEMENT PROPOSED BY THE INTEREST ARBITRATOR, THE AUTHORITY HAS PREVIOUSLY HELD THAT "A WAIVER WILL BE FOUND ONLY IF IT CAN BE SHOWN THAT THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE CLEARLY AND UNMISTAKABLY WAIVED ITS RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE." DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY, 6 FLRA NO. 100 (1981); DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, ILLINOIS, 5 FLRA NO. 2 (1981). IN THE INSTANT CASE, THERE IS NOTHING IN THE RECORD TO INDICATE THAT CREA CONSCIOUSLY YIELDED ITS RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE CONCERNING THE 1980 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN EITHER BY THEREAFTER EXECUTING AN AGREEMENT CONTAINING THE LANGUAGE SET FORTH AT N. 2, SUPRA, OR BY PREVIOUSLY AGREEING TO PARTICIPATE IN INTEREST ARBITRATION. FINALLY, WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSERTION THAT NO DUTY TO BARGAIN AROSE BECAUSE THE LIBRARY MADE NO CHANGE IN THE PREVIOUS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN, THE RECORD INDICATES THAT A NUMBER OF SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES WERE MADE. /4/ IN ANY EVENT, THE LIBRARY'S CONTENTION THAT IT HAD NO DUTY TO BARGAIN WITH REGARD TO CHANGES IN CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT PROPOSED BY THE CREA BUT ONLY WITH REGARD TO CHANGES PROPOSED BY THE LIBRARY IS CLEARLY INCONSISTENT WITH THE DEFINITION AND PURPOSE OF "COLLECTIVE BARGAINING" UNDER THE STATUTE, /5/ AND THEREFORE CANNOT BE SUSTAINED. ACCORDINGLY, AS THE LIBRARY HAS STIPULATED ITS REFUSAL TO BARGAIN ON THE MATTER AT ISSUE, THE AUTHORITY CONCLUDES THAT THE LIBRARY FAILED AND REFUSED TO NEGOTIATE WITH CREA FROM SEPTEMBER 10, 1979 IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 7116(A)(1) AND (5) OF THE STATUTE. ORDER /6/ PURSUANT TO SECTION 2423.29 OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS AND SECTION 7118 OF THE STATUTE, THE AUTHORITY HEREBY ORDERS THAT THE RESPONDENT LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, WASHINGTON, D.C. SHALL: 1. CEASE AND DESIST FROM: (A) ESTABLISHING OR IMPLEMENTING CHANGES IN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLANS WITHOUT FIRST AFFORDING CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CREA), INDEPENDENT, EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE OF A UNIT OF RESPONDENT'S EMPLOYEES, NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY TO BARGAIN CONSONANT WITH THE OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED BY THE STATUTE. (B) IN ANY LIKE OR RELATED MANNER INTERFERING WITH, RESTRAINING, OR COERCING EMPLOYEES IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR RIGHTS ASSURED BY THE STATUTE. 2. TAKE THE FOLLOWING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ORDER TO EFFECTUATE THE PURPOSES AND POLICIES OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE: (A) UPON REQUEST OF THE CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CREA), INDEPENDENT, THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE OF A UNIT OF THE RESPONDENT'S EMPLOYEES, BARGAIN CONSONANT WITH THE OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED BY THE STATUTE CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF OR IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGES IN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLANS. (B) POST AT ITS WASHINGTON, D.C. FACILITY COPIES OF THE ATTACHED NOTICE ON FORMS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY. UPON RECEIPT OF SUCH FORMS, THEY SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS, AND SHALL BE POSTED AND MAINTAINED BY HIM FOR 60 CONSECUTIVE DAYS THEREAFTER IN CONSPICUOUS PLACES, INCLUDING ALL BULLETIN BOARDS AND OTHER PLACES WHERE NOTICES TO EMPLOYEES ARE CUSTOMARILY POSTED. THE LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS SHALL TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO INSURE THAT SUCH NOTICES ARE NOT ALTERED, DEFACED, OR COVERED BY ANY OTHER MATERIAL. (C) NOTIFY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF REGION III, IN WRITING, WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, AS TO WHAT STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO COMPLY HEREWITH. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JULY 13, 1982 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES PURSUANT TO A DECISION AND ORDER OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND IN ORDER TO EFFECTUATE THE POLICIES OF CHAPTER 71 OF TITLE 5 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS WE HEREBY NOTIFY OUR EMPLOYEES THAT: WE WILL NOT ESTABLISH OR IMPLEMENT CHANGES IN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLANS WITHOUT FIRST AFFORDING CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CREA), INDEPENDENT, THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE OF A UNIT OF OUR EMPLOYEES, NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY TO BARGAIN CONSONANT WITH THE OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED BY THE STATUTE. WE WILL NOT IN ANY LIKE OR RELATED MANNER INTERFERE WITH, RESTRAIN, OR COERCE OUR EMPLOYEES IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR RIGHTS ASSURED BY THE STATUTE. WE WILL, UPON REQUEST OF THE CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CREA), INDEPENDENT, THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE OF A UNIT OF OUR EMPLOYEES, BARGAIN CONSONANT WITH THE OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED BY THE STATUTE CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF OR IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGES IN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLANS. . . . (AGENCY OR ACTIVITY) DATED: . . . BY: (SIGNATURE) THIS NOTICE MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR 60 CONSECUTIVE DAYS FROM THE DATE OF POSTING, AND MUST NOT BE ALTERED, DEFACED, OR COVERED BY ANY OTHER MATERIAL. IF EMPLOYEES HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS NOTICE OR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY OF ITS PROVISIONS, THEY MAY COMMUNICATE DIRECTLY WITH THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, REGION III, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, WHOSE ADDRESS IS: 1111 18TH STREET, N.W., SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036, AND WHOSE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS: (202) 653-8452. --------------- FOOTNOTES$ --------------- /1/ AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND AIR FORCE LOGISTICS COMMAND, WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO, 2 FLRA 603, 615-619 (1980), ENFORCED AS TO OTHER MATTERS SUB NOM. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE V. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, 659 F.2D 1140 (D.C. CIR. 1981), CERT. DENIED SUB NOM. AFGE V. FLRA, 50 LW 3669 (1982). /2/ ARTICLE XI, SECTION 3 OF THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT PROVIDES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 3. THE LIBRARY AGREES TO MEET AT REASONABLE TIMES NORMALLY AT LEAST 90 DAYS PRIOR TO PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLANS AND CONFER IN GOOD FAITH WITH RESPECT TO ASPECTS OF SUCH PLANS AND PROGRAMS WHICH AFFECT PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PRACTICES AND MATTERS AFFECTING WORKING CONDITIONS. THE LIBRARY AGREES TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITY FOR PARTICIPATION BY THE ASSOCIATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLANS AND TO INSURE GOOD FAITH CONSIDERATION OF ALL SUGGESTED PROGRAMS PROPOSED BY THE ASSOCIATION FOR INCLUSION IN SUCH PLANS. THE LIBRARY AGREES TO MEET REASONABLE REQUESTS FOR NON-PRIVILEGED AND NON-CONFIDENTIAL DATA RELEVANT AND NECESSARY TO ASSIST IN SUCH CONSIDERATIONS WITHIN REASONABLE TIME. /3/ THE RECORD INDICATES THAT THE AGREEMENT, INCLUDING ARTICLE XI, SECTION 3 UPON WHICH THE LIBRARY RELIES (SUPRA N. 2), WAS EXECUTED ON SEPTEMBER 20, 1979, AND ONLY BECAME EFFECTIVE 60 DAYS THEREAFTER. /4/ FOR EXAMPLE, THE LIBRARY'S PROPOSED 1980 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN CONTAINED TWO LESS TRAINING, APPRAISAL AND PROMOTION (TAP) POSITIONS THAN THE PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1979, AND ALSO BEGAN A POLICY OF ALLOCATING 75% OF THE TUITION SUPPORT PROGRAM TO UNDERGRADUATES AND 25% TO GRADUATES. /5/ SECTION 7103(A)(12) OF THE STATUTE PROVIDES: SEC. 7103. DEFINITIONS; APPLICATION (A) FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS CHAPTER-- (12) "COLLECTIVE BARGAINING" MEANS THE PERFORMANCE OF THE MUTUAL OBLIGATION OF THE REPRESENTATIVE OF AN AGENCY AND THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE OF EMPLOYEES IN AN APPROPRIATE UNIT IN THE AGENCY TO MEET AT REASONABLE TIMES AND TO CONSULT AND BARGAIN IN A GOOD-FAITH EFFORT TO REACH AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT AFFECTING SUCH EMPLOYEES AND TO EXECUTE, IF REQUESTED BY EITHER PARTY, A WRITTEN DOCUMENT INCORPORATING ANY COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT REACHED, BUT THE OBLIGATION REFERRED TO IN THIS PARAGRAPH DOES NOT COMPEL EITHER PARTY TO AGREE TO A PROPOSAL OR TO MAKE A CONCESSION(.) SEE, GENERALLY, SECTION 7101 OF THE STATUTE REGARDING THE FINDINGS AND PURPOSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES. /6/ INASMUCH AS THE LIBRARY'S AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1980 HAS EXPIRED, THE AUTHORITY FINDS THAT IT WOULD NOT EFFECTUATE THE PURPOSES AND POLICIES OF THE STATUTE TO ISSUE A STATUS QUO ANTE ORDER HEREIN. RATHER, THE AUTHORITY WILL ORDER THE LIBRARY TO BARGAIN, UPON REQUEST, CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF, OR IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGES IN, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLANS AFFECTING EMPLOYEES IN THE BARGAINING UNIT EXCLUSIVELY REPRESENTED BY THE CREA.