[ v08 p397 ]
08:0397(82)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
8 FLRA No. 82 VETERANS ADMINISTRATION CENTER RICHMOND, VIRGINIA (Activity) and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 2145, AFL-CIO (Union) Case No. O-AR-362 ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY ON EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD OF ARBITRATOR JAMES P. WHYTE FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 7122(A) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (5 U.S.C. 7122(A)) AND SECTION 2425.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R. 2425.1 (1981)). FOR THE REASONS STATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS MUST BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY FILED. UNDER SECTION 7122(B) OF THE STATUTE AND SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING AN EXCEPTION TO AN ARBITRATION AWARD IS 30 DAYS BEGINNING ON AND INCLUDING THE DATE OF THE AWARD. ADDITIONALLY, UNDER SECTION 2429.21 OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS, ANY SUCH EXCEPTION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE AUTHORITY BEFORE THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON THE LAST DAY OF THE PRESCRIBED TIME LIMIT. THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD IN THIS CASE, AS INCLUDED IN THE SUBMISSION BEFORE THE AUTHORITY, IS DATED FEBRUARY 4, 1982. THEREFORE, UNDER THE ABOVE-CITED PROVISIONS OF THE STATUTE AND THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, ANY EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD HAD TO BE FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY, I.E., RECEIVED, NO LATER THAN THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON MARCH 5, 1982. HOWEVER, THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE NOT FILED UNTIL MARCH 23, 1982. IN THAT REGARD, AND AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 2429.23(D) OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS, THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS TO AN ARBITRATION AWARD MAY NOT BE EXTENDED OR WAIVED BY THE AUTHORITY. ACCORDINGLY, AS THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, /1/ THE EXCEPTIONS ARE HEREBY DISMISSED. FOR THE AUTHORITY. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 30, 1982 JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR --------------- FOOTNOTES: --------------- /1/ UNDER SECTION 2425.1(A) OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, ONLY A PARTY TO A PARTICULAR ARBITRATION MAY FILE AN EXCEPTION TO THE ARBITRATOR'S WARD. IN THIS CASE, THE ARBITRATOR'S OPINION AND AWARD CLEARLY INDICATE THAT THE PARTIES IN THE ARBITRATION PROCEEDING HERE INVOLVED WERE THE ACTIVITY AND THE UNION. THUS, SINCE IT APPEARS THAT THE GRIEVANT, WHO FILED THE INSTANT EXCEPTIONS, DID NOT PARTICIPATE AS A "PARTY" IN THE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR, IT ALSO APPEARS THAT THE GRIEVANT IS WITHOUT STANDING TO FILE THOSE EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD.