[ v08 p286 ]
08:0286(68)RO
The decision of the Authority follows:
8 FLRA No. 68 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR, REGION III Activity and NATIONAL COUNCIL OF FIELD LABOR LOCALS, AFGE, AFL-CIO Petitioner Case No. 2-RO-34 DECISION AND ORDER UPON A PETITION DULY FILED WITH THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 7111(B)(1) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE), A HEARING WAS HELD BEFORE A HEARING OFFICER OF THE AUTHORITY. THE AUTHORITY HAS REVIEWED THE HEARING OFFICER'S RULINGS MADE AT THE HEARING AND FINDS THAT THEY ARE FREE FROM PREJUDICIAL ERROR. THE RULINGS ARE HEREBY AFFIRMED. UPON THE ENTIRE RECORD, INCLUDING A BRIEF SUBMITTED BY THE ACTIVITY, THE AUTHORITY FINDS: THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF FIELD LABOR LOCALS, AFGE, AFL-CIO, (THE PETITIONER), SEEKS AN ELECTION IN A UNIT CONSISTING OF ALL NONSUPERVISORY ATTORNEYS IN THE OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR, REGION III OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PHILADELPHIA, EXCLUDING ALL OTHER EMPLOYEES, MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS, SUPERVISORS, AND EMPLOYEES DESCRIBED IN SECTION 7112(B)(2), (3), (4), (6) AND (7) OF THE STATUTE. ADDITIONALLY, THE PETITIONER SEEKS TO HAVE THIS UNIT INCLUDED IN THE EXISTING NATION-WIDE UNIT WHICH IT CURRENTLY REPRESENTS. /1/ THE ACTIVITY AND THE AGENCY ASSERT THAT THE PETITION SHOULD BE DISMISSED BECAUSE OF, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE PROSCRIPTION CONTAINED IN SECTION 7112(B)(4) OF THE STATUTE; THAT IS, THE UNIT WOULD BE COMPOSED OF EMPLOYEES WHO ARE ENGAGED IN ADMINISTERING PROVISIONS OF THE STATUTE. THE OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, IS COMPOSED OF A NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS OFFICE IN WASHINGTON, D.C., EIGHT MAJOR REGIONAL OFFICES, AND SEVERAL FIELD OFFICES, EACH OF THE EIGHT REGIONAL OFFICES SHARES THE COMMON MISSION OF PROVIDING LEGAL SERVICES TO THE VARIOUS ENTITIES WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. THE ACTIVITY IS STAFFED BY A REGIONAL DIRECTOR, A DEPUTY REGIONAL DIRECTOR, TWO REGIONAL COUNSELS AND APPROXIMATELY TWENTY-FOUR STAFF ATTORNEYS. /2/ ALTHOUGH THE STAFF ATTORNEYS HAVE PRIMARY AREAS OF ASSIGNMENT, IT IS THE POLICY AND PRACTICE OF THE OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR THAT ALL ATTORNEYS BE GENERALISTS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO ASSIGNMENT TO ANY AREA. A THRESHOLD ISSUE IN THIS CASE IS WHETHER THE AUTHORITY IS PRECLUDED FROM FINDING THE PETITIONED FOR UNIT APPROPRIATE BECAUSE OF SECTION 7112(B)(4) OF THE STATUTE WHICH PROVIDES THAT A UNIT MAY NOT BE DETERMINED TO BE APPROPRIATE IF IT INCLUDES AN EMPLOYEE ENGAGED IN ADMINISTERING PROVISIONS OF THE STATUTE. THUS, AS APPLICABLE TO THIS CASE, THE AUTHORITY MAY NOT FIND THE PETITIONED FOR UNIT APPROPRIATE IF IT INCLUDES EMPLOYEES ENGAGED IN ADMINISTERING SECTION 7120 OF THE STATUTE, AS ALLEGED BY THE ACTIVITY. SECTION 7120(A) THROUGH (E) OF THE STATUTE RELATES TO STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR LABOR ORGANIZATIONS IN THE FEDERAL SECTOR. THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE SUBSECTIONS ARE NOT MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM, AND THE LANGUAGE IN SOME OF THE SUBSECTIONS IS IDENTICAL TO, THE REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN SECTION 18 OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 11491, AS AMENDED, WHICH PRECEDED SECTION 7120 AND FULFILLED A SIMILAR FUNCTION WITH REGARD TO LABOR ORGANIZATIONS IN THE FEDERAL SECTOR. THE REGULATIONS WHICH THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF LABOR FOR LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS (ASSISTANT SECRETARY) HAS PRESCRIBED TO IMPLEMENT SECTION 7120(A) THROUGH (3) OF THE STATUTE ARE NOT MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE PRIOR REGULATIONS ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE EXECUTIVE ORDER. /3/ AS NOTED EARLIER, THE ATTORNEYS IN THE PETITIONED FOR UNIT ARE GENERALISTS AND THUS ARE RESPONSIBLE, INTER ALIA, FOR PROVIDING LEGAL ADVICE AND ASSISTANCE WITH REGARD TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF SECTION 7120(A) THROUGH (E) OF THE STATUTE. WHILE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD AS TO THE ACTUAL PARTICIPATION TO DATE OF THESE ATTORNEYS IN SUCH ACTIVITIES, THE AUTHORITY TAKES OFFICIAL NOTICE THAT SIMILARLY SITUATED EMPLOYEES PARTICIPATED IN SUCH ACTIVITIES UNDER THE EXECUTIVE ORDER. /4/ UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IT IS CLEAR THAT IN THE PETITIONED FOR UNIT EMPLOYEES HAVE THE DUTY AND WILL IN FACT BE CALLED UPON TO ADMINISTER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 7120(A) THROUGH (E) OF THE STATUTE. SEE FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE, REGION 7, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, 3 FLRA NO. 19 (1980). THUS, THE AUTHORITY IS PRECLUDED FROM FINDING THE PETITIONED FOR UNIT APPROPRIATE BECAUSE OF SECTION 7112(B)(4) OF THE STATUTE. ORDER ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE PETITIONED IN CASE NO. 2-RO-34 BE, AND IT HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., MARCH 26, 1982 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY --------------- FOOTNOTES: --------------- /1/ THE PETITIONER IS THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE OF A NATIONWIDE UNIT OF FIELD EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DESCRIBED AS: ALL PROFESSIONAL AND NONPROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES IN THE FIELD DUTY STATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EXCLUDING EMPLOYEES ENGAGED IN FEDERAL PERSONNEL WORK IN OTHER THAN A CLERICAL CAPACITY, MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS, SUPERVISORS, AND NONCLERICAL EMPLOYEES OF THE LABOR-MANAGEMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION. /2/ THE PARTIES ARE IN AGREEMENT THAT THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, DEPUTY REGIONAL DIRECTOR, AND TWO REGIONAL COUNSELS ARE SUPERVISORS AS DEFINED IN SECTION 7103(A)(10) OF THE STATUTE AND MUST THEREBY BE EXCLUDED FROM ANY UNIT FOUND APPROPRIATE BY THE AUTHORITY. /3/ COMPARE 29 CFR PARTS 207-209 WITH 40 FED. REG 19980, 19992-19998 (1975). /4/ AS AN EXAMPLE, SEE LOCAL 1841, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, 6 A/SLMR 396 (1976), WHERE AN ATTORNEY ASSIGNED TO THE OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, REPRESENTED THE DIRECTOR LMSE BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE. ALSO IN AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1592, 6 A/SLMR 520 (1976), AN ATTORNEY ASSIGNED TO THE OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR, DENVER, COLORADO REPRESENTED THE DIRECTOR LMSE BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE.