[ v08 p33 ]
08:0033(6)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
8 FLRA No. 6 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1533 Union and NAVAL SUPPLY CENTER OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA Agency Case No. 0-NG-263 DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY APPEAL THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IN THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY (THE AUTHORITY) PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE), AND RAISES THE QUESTION OF THE NEGOTIABILITY OF A UNION PROPOSAL. UPON CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE ENTIRE RECORD, INCLUDING THE PARTIES' CONTENTIONS, THE AUTHORITY MAKES THE FOLLOWING DETERMINATIONS. UNION PROPOSAL EMPLOYEE REPROMOTION AFTER REDUCTION-IN-FORCE. REPROMOTION WILL BE IN RETENTION ORDER AND WILL BE APPLIED AS VACANCIES OCCUR. IN AGREEMENT WITH THE AGENCY, THE AUTHORITY CONCLUDES THAT THE PROPOSAL IS OUTSIDE THE DUTY TO BARGAIN BECAUSE IT WOULD DIRECTLY INTERFERE WITH MANAGEMENT'S RIGHTS UNDER SECTION 7106(A)(2)(C) /1/ OF THE STATUTE BY REQUIRING THE AGENCY TO SELECT REPROMOTION ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES IN RETENTION ORDER AFTER A REDUCTION-IN-FORCE AS VACANCIES OCCUR. IN THIS REGARD, THE PROPOSAL BEARS NO MATERIAL DIFFERENCE FROM THE PROPOSAL FOUND NONNEGOTIABLE PURSUANT TO SECTION 7106(A)(2)(C) IN AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 2782 AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, WASHINGTON, D.C., 7 FLRA NO. 13(1981), APPEAL DOCKETED, NO. 81-2386 (D.C. CIR. DEC. 29, 1981). FOR THE REASONS FULLY SET FORTH THEREIN, THE PROPOSAL HERE IN DISPUTE MUST LIKEWISE BE FOUND NONNEGOTIABLE. /2/ ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2424.10 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS (5 CFR 2424.10(1981)), IT IS ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR REVIEW BE, AND IT HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. /3/ ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., FEBRUARY 4, 1982 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY --------------- FOOTNOTES: --------------- /1/ SECTION 7106(A)(2)(C) PROVIDES, IN RELEVANT PART, AS FOLLOWS: SEC. 7106. MANAGEMENT RIGHTS (A) SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION, NOTHING IN THIS CHAPTER SHALL AFFECT THE AUTHORITY OF ANY MANAGEMENT OFFICIAL OF ANY AGENCY-- * * * * (2) IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS-- * * * * (C) WITH RESPECT TO FILLING POSITIONS, TO MAKE SELECTIONS FOR APPOINTMENTS FROM-- (I) AMONG PROPERLY RANKED AND CERTIFIED CANDIDATES FOR PROMOTION; OR (II) ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE SOURCE(.) /2/ THE UNION CONTENDS, IN ESSENCE, THAT THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT RESTRICT MANAGEMENT'S RIGHT TO SELECT EMPLOYEES OR REQUIRE MANAGEMENT TO FILL VACANCIES. THIS CONTENTION IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE EXPRESS LANGUAGE OF THE PROPOSAL AND THEREFORE IS REJECTED. IN THIS REGARD, IT IS NOTED THAT IF THE PROPOSAL WERE REVISED TO PERMIT MANAGEMENT TO EXERCISE ITS RIGHTS UNDER SECTION 7106 AND TO SET FORTH A PROCEDURE WHICH MANAGEMENT WOULD FOLLOW IN THE EXERCISE OF SUCH RIGHTS, SUCH A PROPOSAL WOULD BE NEGOTIABLE UNDER SECTION 7106(B)(2) OF THE STATUTE. SEE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1999 AND ARMY-AIR FORCE EXCHANGE SERVICE, DIX-MCGUIRE EXCHANGE, FORT DIX, NEW JERSEY, 2 FLRA 152(1979), ENFORCED SUB NOM. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE V. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, 659 F.2D 1140 (D.C. CIR. 1981). /3/ IN REACHING THE MERITS HEREIN, THE AUTHORITY CONCLUDES, CONTRARY TO THE AGENCY'S CONTENTION, THAT THE AGENCY'S UNREQUESTED ALLEGATION DOES NOT MAKE THIS PETITION FOR REVIEW UNTIMELY. SEE SECTION 2424.3 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS (5 CFR 2424.3). RATHER, THE PETITION WAS TIMELY FILED, FOLLOWING THE UNION'S REQUEST FOR AN ALLEGATION AND THE AGENCY'S RESPONSE THERETO. SEE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 3385 AND FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD, DISTRICT 7, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, 7 FLRA NO. 58(1981).