American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1170, AFL-CIO (Union) and Public Health Service Hospital, Seattle, Washington (Activity)
[ v07 p764 ]
07:0764(128)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
7 FLRA No. 128 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1170 (Union) and PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE HOSPITAL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (Activity) Case No. O-NG-503 ORDER DISMISSING NEGOTIABILITY APPEAL THIS CASE IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (5 U.S.C. 7101 ET SEQ.) ON A PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED BY THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1170 (THE UNION). FOR THE REASONS INDICATED BELOW, THE UNION'S APPEAL MUST BE DISMISSED. ON DECEMBER 10, 1981, THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE HOSPITAL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (THE ACTIVITY) FILED A MOTION TO DISMISS THE SUBJECT APPEAL. IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION, THE ACTIVITY CONTENDS THAT IN A TRANSFER EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 20, 1981, CONTROL OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE HOSPITAL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON WAS PASSED FROM THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES TO THE SEATTLE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE HOSPITAL PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON STATE. THE AGENCY FURTHER CONTENDS THAT SINCE THE HOSPITAL IS NO LONGER A FEDERAL FACILITY, THE PRESENT CASE HAS BEEN RENDERED MOOT, AND THAT THE AUTHORITY IS PRECLUDED BY SECTION 2429.10 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, WHICH PROHIBITS THE ISSUANCE OF ADVISORY OPINIONS, FROM ISSUING A DECISION IN THIS CASE. THE UNION DID NOT FILE ANY OPPOSITION TO THE ACTIVITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS. UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE AGENCY'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE TRANSFER OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE HOSPITAL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON FROM FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL TO A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON STATE, REMOVED THE SUBJECT DISPUTE FROM THE AUTHORITY'S JURISDICTION. ACCORDINGLY, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE UNION'S PETITION FOR REVIEW IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE BE, AND HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. /1/ FOR THE AUTHORITY. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JANUARY 28, 1982 JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR --------------- FOOTNOTES: --------------- /1/ IN SO DECIDING TO DISMISS THIS CASE, THE AUTHORITY MAKES NO JUDGMENT ON THE NEGOTIABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL INVOLVED.