[ v07 p205 ]
07:0205(31)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
7 FLRA No. 31 TIDEWATER VIRGINIA FEDERAL EMPLOYEES METAL TRADES COUNCIL (Union) and NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD (Activity) Case No. O-NG-538 ORDER DISMISSING NEGOTIABILITY APPEAL THIS CASE IS BEFORE THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (5 U.S.C. 7101 ET SEQ.) ON A PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE FILED BY THE UNION. THE RECORD IN THIS CASE INDICATES THAT DURING NEGOTIATIONS THE ACTIVITY ALLEGED THAT THE DUTY TO BARGAIN DOES NOT EXTEND TO A UNION PROPOSAL CONCERNING REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASES OF SAFETY SHOES BECAUSE THE PROPOSAL CONFLICTS WITH A NAVY REGULATION. THE UNION THEN FILED THE INSTANT APPEAL WITH THE AUTHORITY, SEEKING A DETERMINATION, PURSUANT TO SECTION 7117(B) OF THE STATUTE AND SECTION 2424.1(B)(3) OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES OF PROCEDURE (5 CFR 2424.1(B)(3)(1981)), AS TO WHETHER A COMPELLING NEED EXISTS FOR THE AGENCY REGULATION IN QUESTION. SUBSEQUENTLY, IN ITS STATEMENT OF POSITION FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 2424.6 OF THE RULES, THE AGENCY IN EFFECT WITHDREW THE ACTIVITY'S ALLEGATION THAT THE DUTY TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH DOES NOT EXTEND TO THE UNION PROPOSAL. BASED ON THE AGENCY'S WITHDRAWAL OF ITS ALLEGATION THAT THE UNION'S PROPOSAL IS NOT WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH UNDER THE STATUTE, THE CASE BEFORE THE AUTHORITY HAS BEEN RENDERED MOOT. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE UNION'S PETITION FOR REVIEW HEREIN BE, AND IT HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. FOR THE AUTHORITY. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., NOVEMBER 13, 1981 JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR