[ v05 p599 ]
05:0599(80)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
5 FLRA No. 80 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1332 (Union) and DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY MATERIEL DEVELOPMENT AND READINESS COMMAND (Activity) Case No. 0-NG-455 ORDER DISMISSING NEGOTIABILITY APPEAL THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY (THE AUTHORITY) PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE) (5 U.S.C. 7101 ET SEQ.). THE BASIC FACTS, AS SET FORTH IN THE RECORD, ARE THAT THE LOCAL PARTIES (NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1332 AND DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY MATERIEL DEVELOPMENT AND READINESS COMMAND) EXECUTED A NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT ON JANUARY 14, 1981, AND SUBMITTED IT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7114(C) OF THE STATUTE; AND THAT BY A TELEPHONE CALL ON FEBRUARY 12, 1981, THE MATERIEL DEVELOPMENT AND READINESS COMMAND NOTIFIED LOCAL 1332 THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HAD ISSUED A LETTER DISAPPROVING A NUMBER OF PROVISIONS OF THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT AS BEING INCONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE LAW. ON MARCH 11, 1981, THE MATERIEL READINESS AND DEVELOPMENT COMMAND ISSUED A LETTER TO THE UNION IN WHICH SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF THE NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT THAT WERE NOT ACCEPTABLE TO THE ARMY WERE IDENTIFIED. THIS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE UNION WAS THUS DATED FIFTY-SIX DAYS AFTER THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT WAS SIGNED, ON JANUARY 14, 1981. SECTION 7114(C) OF THE STATUTE PROVIDES IN PERTINENT PART: (C)(1) AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN ANY AGENCY AND AN EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE HEAD OF AN AGENCY. (2) THE HEAD OF THE AGENCY SHALL APPROVE THE AGREEMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE THE AGREEMENT IS EXECUTED IF THE AGREEMENT IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE, OR REGULATION (UNLESS THE AGENCY HAS GRANTED AN EXCEPTION TO THE PROVISION). (3) IF THE HEAD OF THE AGENCY DOES NOT APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE THE AGREEMENT WITHIN THE 30-DAY PERIOD, THE AGREEMENT SHALL TAKE EFFECT AND SHALL BE BINDING ON THE AGENCY AND THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE, OR REGULATION. THUS, UNDER SECTION 7114(C)(3) OF THE STATUTE, AN AGREEMENT WHICH HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE AGENCY INVOLVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ITS EXECUTION BECOMES EFFECTIVE AND BINDING ON THE PARTIES ON THE 31ST DAY, WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE AGENCY, SUBJECT ONLY TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATUTE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION. THE AUTHORITY HAS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED THAT AN AGENCY HEAD'S DISAPPROVAL OF A LOCALLY NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 7114(C)(3) OF THE STATUTE MUST BE SERVED ON THE UNION INVOLVED WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE THE AGREEMENT IS EXECUTED BY THE PARTIES. /1/ IN ADDITION SECTION 2429.27(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS PROVIDES THAT SERVICE OF ANY DOCUMENT OR PAPER BY ANY PARTY, INCLUDING DOCUMENTS AND PAPER SERVED BY ONE PARTY ON ANOTHER, SHALL BE MADE BY CERTIFIED MAIL OR IN PERSON. THUS, AN AGENCY HEAD'S NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL OF A LOCALLY NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT MUST BE IN WRITTEN FORM AND EITHER MAILED BY CERTIFIED MAIL OR DELIVERED IN PERSON TO THE UNION'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED. ABSENT SUCH TIMELY SERVICE OF THE DISAPPROVAL, THE AGREEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON THE 31ST DAY AND IS BINDING ON THE PARTIES THEREAFTER, SUBJECT, OF COURSE, TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE STATUTE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE, OR REGULATION. IN THIS CASE, AS PREVIOUSLY INDICATED, THE PARTIES' NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT WAS EXECUTED ON JANUARY 14, 1981, AND SUBMITTED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL. ALTHOUGH A TELEPHONE CALL WAS MADE TO THE UNION BY THE ACTIVITY ON FEBRUARY 12, 1981, THE UNION WAS NOT SERVED WITH THE AGENCY HEAD'S DISAPPROVAL UNTIL MARCH 11, 1981, OR FIFTY-SIX DAYS AFTER THE AGREEMENT WAS EXECUTED AND SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL. THEREFORE, UNDER SECTION 7114(C)(3) OF THE STATUTE, THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT WENT INTO EFFECT ON FEBRUARY 14, 1981, AND IS BINDING ON THE PARTIES, SUBJECT ONLY TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATUTE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION. CONSEQUENTLY, SINCE THE ENTIRE AGREEMENT, AS NEGOTIATED AND EXECUTED BY THE PARTIES, BECAME EFFECTIVE NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 14, 1981, THE AGENCY'S SUBSEQUENT DISAPPROVAL RAISES NO DISPUTE CONCERNING THE TERMS OF SUCH AGREEMENT WHICH IS COGNIZABLE UNDER SECTION 7117 OF THE STATUTE. OUR CONCLUSION THAT THE PROPRIETY OF THE AGENCY'S DISAPPROVAL OF A NUMBER OF THE AGREEMENT PROVISIONS IS NOT COGNIZABLE IN THE PRESENT PROCEEDING DOES NOT, OF COURSE, MEAN THAT ANY PROVISIONS IN THE AGREEMENT WHICH ARE CONTRARY TO THE STATUTE OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION, ARE THEREBY ENFORCEABLE. RATHER, A QUESTION AS TO THE VALIDITY OF SUCH PROVISIONS MAY BE RAISED IN OTHER APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS (SUCH AS GRIEVANCE ARBITRATION AND UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE PROCEEDING) AND, IF THE AGREEMENT PROVISIONS ARE THERE FOUND TO BE VIOLATIVE OF THE STATUTE OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION, THEY WOULD NOT BE ENFORCEABLE BUT WOULD BE DEEMED VOID AND UNENFORCEABLE. ACCORDINGLY, SINCE THE UNION'S APPEAL DOES NOT MEET THE CONDITIONS FOR REVIEW UNDER SECTION 7117 OF THE STATUTE AND SECTION 2424.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. FOR THE AUTHORITY. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., MAY 14, 1981 JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR --------------- FOOTNOTES$ --------------- /1/ NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1862 AND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE, PHOENIX, ARIZONA, 3 FLRA NO. 25(1980). ACCORD, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1858 AND U.S. ARMY MISSILE COMMAND, REDSTONE ARSENAL, ALABAMA, 4 FLRA NO. 47(1980), (REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED MARCH 5, 1981).