[ v05 p596 ]
05:0596(79)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
5 FLRA No. 79 WASHINGTON AREA METAL TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO (Union) and NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY, WASHINGTON, D.C. (Activity) Case No. 0-NG-292 ORDER DISMISSING NEGOTIABILITY APPEAL THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT STATUTE (5 U.S.C. 7101 ET SEQ. (SUPP. III 1979)). THE BASIC FACTS, AS SET FORTH IN THE RECORD, ARE THAT THE LOCAL PARTIES EXECUTED A NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 13, 1980, AND SUBMITTED IT TO THE AGENCY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7114(C) OF THE STATUTE; AND THAT BY LETTER SERVED UPON THE UNION ON MARCH 25, 1980, THE AGENCY NOTIFIED THE UNION THAT IT HAD DISAPPROVED A NUMBER OF PROVISIONS OF THAT AGREEMENT. THUS, THE AGENCY'S DISAPPROVAL WAS SERVED ON THE UNION MORE THAN 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE THE AGREEMENT WAS EXECUTED. SECTION 7114(C) OF THE STATUTE PROVIDES IN PERTINENT PART: (C)(1) AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN ANY AGENCY AND AN EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE HEAD OF AN AGENCY. (2) THE HEAD OF THE AGENCY SHALL APPROVE THE AGREEMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE THE AGREEMENT IS EXECUTED IF THE AGREEMENT IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE, OR REGULATION (UNLESS THE AGENCY HAS GRANTED AN EXCEPTION TO THE PROVISION). (3) IF THE HEAD OF THE AGENCY DOES NOT APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE THE AGREEMENT WITHIN THE 30-DAY PERIOD, THE AGREEMENT SHALL TAKE EFFECT AND SHALL BE BINDING ON THE AGENCY AND THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE, OR REGULATION. THUS, UNDER SECTION 7114(C)(3) OF THE STATUTE, AN AGREEMENT WHICH HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE AGENCY INVOLVED WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ITS EXECUTION BECOMES EFFECTIVE AND BINDING ON THE PARTIES ON THE 31ST DAY, WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE AGENCY, SUBJECT ONLY TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATUTE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION. IN THE STATEMENT OF POSITION, THE AGENCY ASSERTS, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THAT IT DID DISAPPROVE CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT ON MARCH 3, 1980 AND COMMUNICATED THE DISAPPROVAL TO NAVY PERSONNEL IN AN INTERNAL MEMO. THE AGENCY CONTENDS THAT 5 U.S.C. 7114(C) SPEAKS ONLY TO THE ACTION OF THE AGENCY HEAD, NOT TO THE NOTIFICATION OF THE UNION AND THAT FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE UNION DOES NOT INVALIDATE THE AGENCY HEAD'S ACTION. THE AUTHORITY HAS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED, HOWEVER, THAT AN AGENCY HEAD'S DISAPPROVAL OF A LOCALLY NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 7114(C)(3) OF THE STATUTE MUST BE SERVED ON THE UNION INVOLVED WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE THE AGREEMENT IS EXECUTED BY THE PARTIES. /1/ IN ADDITION, SECTION 2429.27(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS PROVIDES THAT SERVICE OF ANY DOCUMENT OR PAPER BY ANY PARTY, INCLUDING DOCUMENTS AND PAPERS SERVED BY ONE PARTY ON ANOTHER, SHALL BE MADE BY CERTIFIED MAIL OR IN PERSON. THUS, AN AGENCY HEAD'S NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL OF A LOCALLY NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT MUST BE IN WRITTEN FORM AND EITHER MAILED BY CERTIFIED MAIL OR DELIVERED IN PERSON TO THE UNION'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED. ABSENT SUCH TIMELY SERVICE OF THE DISAPPROVAL, THE AGREEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON THE 31ST DAY AND IS BINDING ON THE PARTIES THEREAFTER SUBJECT, OF COURSE, TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE STATUTE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE, OR REGULATION. IN THIS CASE, AS PREVIOUSLY INDICATED, THE PARTIES' NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT WAS EXECUTED ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 13, 1980, AND SUBMITTED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL. HOWEVER, THE AGENCY'S DISAPPROVAL WAS NOT SERVED ON THE UNION UNTIL MARCH 25, 1980, MORE THAN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE THE AGREEMENT WAS EXECUTED AND SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL. THEREFORE, UNDER SECTION 7114(C)(3) OF THE STATUTE, THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT WENT INTO EFFECT NO LATER THAN MARCH 16, 1980, AND IS BINDING ON THE PARTIES, SUBJECT ONLY TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATUTE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION. CONSEQUENTLY, SINCE THE ENTIRE AGREEMENT, AS NEGOTIATED AND EXECUTED BY THE PARTIES, BECAME EFFECTIVE ON OR BEFORE MARCH 16, 1980, THE AGENCY'S SUBSEQUENT DISAPPROVAL RAISES NO DISPUTE CONCERNING THE TERMS OF SUCH AGREEMENT WHICH IS COGNIZABLE UNDER SECTION 7117 OF THE STATUTE. OUR CONCLUSION THAT THE PROPRIETY OF THE AGENCY'S DISAPPROVAL OF A NUMBER OF THE AGREEMENT PROVISIONS IS NOT COGNIZABLE IN THE PRESENT PROCEEDING DOES NOT, OF COURSE, MEAN THAT ANY PROVISIONS IN THE AGREEMENT WHICH ARE CONTRARY TO THE STATUTE OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION, ARE THEREBY ENFORCEABLE. RATHER, A QUESTION AS TO THE VALIDITY OF SUCH PROVISIONS MAY BE RAISED IN OTHER APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS (SUCH AS GRIEVANCE ARBITRATION AND UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE PROCEEDINGS) AND, IF THE AGREEMENT PROVISIONS ARE THERE FOUND TO BE VIOLATIVE OF THE STATUTE OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION, THEY WOULD NOT BE ENFORCEABLE BUT WOULD BE DEEMED VOID AND UNENFORCEABLE. ACCORDINGLY, SINCE THE UNION'S APPEAL DOES NOT MEET THE CONDITIONS FOR REVIEW UNDER SECTION 7117 OF THE STATUTE AND SECTION 2424.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE UNION'S APPEAL BE, AND IT HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. FOR THE AUTHORITY. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., MAY 14, 1981 JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR