[ v04 p664 ]
04:0664(86)PS
The decision of the Authority follows:
4 FLRA No. 86 Case No. 0-PS-19 DECISION ON REQUEST FOR GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY OR GUIDANCE THE AUTHORITY RECEIVED A REQUEST FROM THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES (NFFE) THAT THE AUTHORITY ISSUE A MAJOR POLICY DETERMINATION CONCERNING, IN EFFECT, WHETHER APPEALS OF ADVERSE ACTIONS INVOLVING NATIONAL GUARD (NG) TECHNICIANS MUST BE EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE OF NEGOTIATED GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES BECAUSE OF THE OPERATION OF SECTION 709(E) OF THE NATIONAL GUARD TECHNICIANS ACT OF 1968 (32 U.S.C. 709(E)) WHICH PROVIDES, IN PERTINENT PART, AS FOLLOWS: (E) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW AND UNDER REGULATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE SECRETARY CONCERNED-- . . . . (4) A REDUCTION IN FORCE, REMOVAL, OR AN ADVERSE ACTION INVOLVING DISCHARGE FROM TECHNICIAN EMPLOYMENT, SUSPENSION, FURLOUGH WITHOUT PAY, OR REDUCTION IN RANK OR COMPENSATION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE ADJUTANT GENERAL OF THE JURISDICTION CONCERNED; (5) A RIGHT OF APPEAL WHICH MAY EXIST WITH RESPECT TO (A REDUCTION IN FORCE, REMOVAL OR AN ADVERSE ACTION AGAINST A TECHNICIAN) SHALL NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE ADJUTANT GENERAL OF THE JURISDICTION CONCERNED(.) ACCORDING TO NFFE'S SUBMISSION, THE REQUEST ARISES OUT OF A SITUATION PRESENTLY FACED BY SOME NFFE LOCALS WHEREIN SUCH LOCALS ARE CONTEMPLATING THE RENEGOTIATION OF BROAD-SCOPE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES AND THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU IS CLAIMING THAT MATTERS INVOLVING APPEALS OF ADVERSE ACTIONS AGAINST NG TECHNICIANS CANNOT BE SENT TO ARBITRATION. THE AUTHORITY HAS CAREFULLY CONSIDERED THIS REQUEST AND HAS DETERMINED THAT IT DOES NOT SATISFY THE STANDARDS GOVERNING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL STATEMENTS OF POLICY AND GUIDANCE SET FORTH IN SECTION 2427.5 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS (5 CFR 2427.5) WHICH PROVIDES IN PERTINENT PART: SEC. 2427.5 STANDARDS GOVERNING ISSUANCE OF GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY AND GUIDANCE. IN DECIDING WHETHER TO ISSUE A GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY OR GUIDANCE, THE AUTHORITY SHALL CONSIDER: (A) WHETHER THE QUESTION PRESENTED CAN MORE APPROPRIATELY BE RESOLVED BY OTHER MEANS(.) THE QUESTION PRESENTED IN THIS REQUEST FOR A MAJOR POLICY DETERMINATION CAN BE MORE APPROPRIATELY RESOLVED BY OTHER MEANS. IN THIS REGARD, THE ESSENCE OF THE QUESTION PRESENTED APPEARS TO BE WHETHER UNION PROPOSED GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES WHICH FAIL TO EXPRESSLY EXCLUDE APPEALS OF ADVERSE ACTIONS OF NG TECHNICIANS FROM INCLUSION WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE NEGOTIATED GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES WOULD BE NONNEGOTIABLE, I.E., INCONSISTENT WITH LAW, RULE OR REGULATIONS, IN THIS CASE, SECTION 709(E) OF THE NATIONAL GUARD TECHNICIANS ACT OF 1968. THUS, THE QUESTION PRESENTED IS APPROPRIATE FOR RESOLUTION UNDER THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN SECTION 7117 OF THE STATUTE AND PART 2424 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS (5 CFR 2424.1 ET SEQ.). /1/ ACCORDINGLY, THE INSTANT REQUEST FOR A MAJOR POLICY DETERMINATION IS DENIED. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., NOVEMBER 12, 1980 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE A COPY OF THE DECISION ON REQUEST FOR GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY OR GUIDANCE OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY IN THE SUBJECT PROCEEDING HAS THIS DAY BEEN MAILED TO THE PARTIES LISTED BELOW: MR. JAMES M. PEIRCE PRESIDENT NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES 1016 16TH STREET, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 MR. KENNETH T. BLAYLOCK NATIONAL PRESIDENT AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO 1325 MASSACHUSETTS AVE., N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 --------------- FOOTNOTES$ --------------- /1/ SEE, E.G., NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL R14-87 AND STATE OF KANSAS ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (AND OTHER CASES CONSOLIDATED THEREWITH), 3 FLRA NO. 124 (1980); AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 3669 AND VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA, 3 FLRA NO. 48 (1980).