[ v03 p499 ]
03:0499(79)RO
The decision of the Authority follows:
3 FLRA No. 79 NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE SOUTHEAST FISHERIES CENTER MIAMI, FLORIDA Activity and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (AFGE), AFL-CIO, LOCAL UNION 2875 Petitioner Case No. 4-RO-16 DECISION AND ORDER UPON A PETITION DULY FILED WITH THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 7111(B)(1) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE, 5 U.S.C. 7101-7135, A HEARING WAS HELD BEFORE A HEARING OFFICER OF THE AUTHORITY. THE AUTHORITY HAS REVIEWED THE HEARING OFFICER'S RULINGS MADE AT THE HEARING AND FINDS THAT THEY ARE FREE FROM PREJUDICIAL ERROR. THE RULINGS ARE HEREBY AFFIRMED. UPON THE ENTIRE RECORD IN THIS CASE, INCLUDING THE BRIEF FILED BY THE ACTIVITY, THE AUTHORITY FINDS: THE PETITIONER CURRENTLY EXCLUSIVELY REPRESENTS A UNIT OF PROFESSIONAL AND NONPROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES WHO ARE EMPLOYED AT THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, SOUTHEAST FISHERIES CENTER, MIAMI, FLORIDA LABORATORY. IN THIS PROCEEDING THE PETITIONER SEEKS TO ADD ON TO ITS EXISTING UNIT OF ABOUT 30 EMPLOYEES, THE APPROXIMATELY 40 EMPLOYEES OF THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE'S SOUTHEAST FISHERIES CENTER WHO ARE PHYSICALLY EMPLOYED IN MIAMI. THE NATIONAL MARITIME FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) IS A COMPONENT OF THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA). NMFS MAINTAINS A HEADQUARTERS IN METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON, D.C., AND AN ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE OF FIVE REGIONS AND FOUR CENTERS. THE REGIONS ARE NORTHEAST, SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST, NORTHWEST AND ALASKA. THE CENTERS ARE NORTHEAST, SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST AND NORTHWEST, WHICH INCLUDES ALASKA. THE REGIONS AND CENTERS APPEAR TO BE IDENTICAL IN GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE, EXCEPT THAT ALASKA IS A SEPARATE REGION BUT PART OF THE NORTHWEST CENTER. THEY ARE ADMINISTRATIVELY INDEPENDENT OF ONE ANOTHER. THE INSTANT CASE INVOLVES ONLY THE SOUTHEAST FISHERIES CENTER (CENTER) AND DOES NOT CONCERN THE SOUTHEAST REGION OR ANY OTHER SUBDIVISION OF NMFS. THE CENTER MAINTAINS A HEADQUARTERS IN MIAMI, FLORIDA, WHICH IS SUBDIVIDED AMONG THE: OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR (DIRECTOR); OFFICE OF PROGRAM PLANNING, EVALUATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT (SUPPORT); OFFICE OF ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR RESEARCH (RESEARCH); AND OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR FISHERY MANAGEMENT (MANAGEMENT). IN ADDITION TO ITS HEADQUARTERS STAFF, THE CENTER CONSISTS OF SEVEN LABORATORIES AND THE TECHNICAL AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES (TIMS). THE LABORATORIES ARE LOCATED IN BEAUFORT, NORTH CAROLINA, CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA, MIAMI, FLORIDA, PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA, PASCAGOULA, MISSISSIPPI, BAY ST. LOUIS, MISSISSIPPI, AND GALVESTON, TEXAS. TIMS WHOSE FUNCTION IS ESSENTIALLY DATA PROCESSING AND COMPILATION OF STATISTICAL DATA, HAS FIELD OFFICES, IN MIAMI, FLORIDA, BEAUFORT, NORTH CAROLINA, GALVESTON, TEXAS AND NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA. AS NOTED ABOVE, THE PETITIONER CURRENTLY REPRESENTS THE EMPLOYEES IN THE MIAMI LABORATORY. IT NOW SEEKS TO ADD TO THAT UNIT ALL OF THE SOUTHEAST FISHERIES CENTER EMPLOYEES WHO WORK AT THE SAME LOCATION. SPECIFICALLY, IT SEEKS ALL ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES IN THE FOUR SUBDIVISIONS OF HEADQUARTERS EXCEPT FOR ONE FISHERY BIOLOGIST WHO IS PHYSICALLY LOCATED AT THE CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA LABORATORY. THE PETITIONER ALSO SEEKS TO REPRESENT TWO EMPLOYEES WHO ARE ADMINISTRATIVELY PART OF THE CHARLESTON LABORATORY BUT WHO ARE PHYSICALLY LOCATED IN MIAMI. IN ADDITION, THE PETITIONER SEEKS TO REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATELY 10 EMPLOYEES ASSIGNED TO TIMS WHO ARE LOCATED IN MIAMI, BUT NOT THE APPROXIMATELY 30 SIMILAR EMPLOYEES AT THE OTHER THREE FIELD OFFICES. THE PETITIONER DOES NOT DESIRE TO REPRESENT ANY EMPLOYEES OF SOUTHEAST FISHERIES CENTER LOCATED OUTSIDE THE MIAMI FACILITY. THE ACTIVITY CONTENDS THAT ONLY AN ACTIVITY-WIDE (CENTER-WIDE) UNIT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE. THE RECORD REVEALS THAT TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT SUCH AS PAY PROCEDURES, HEALTH BENEFITS, TRAINING, PROMOTIONS, DISCIPLINE, GRIEVANCES, HOURS OF WORK, AND AWARDS ARE EITHER ESTABLISHED BY NMFS OR, WHERE APPROPRIATE, BY DELEGATION TO THE DIRECTOR OF SOUTHEAST FISHERIES CENTER. ROUTINE PERSONNEL MATTERS HAVE IN TURN BEEN DELEGATED TO THE REGIONAL PERSONNEL OFFICE WHICH OPERATES FOR THE CENTER AS A WHOLE. ONLY THE DIRECTOR OF SOUTHEAST FISHERIES CENTER IS EMPOWERED TO NEGOTIATE A LABOR AGREEMENT WITHIN THE CENTER, AND EXPERTISE IN LABOR-MANAGEMENT MATTERS RESIDES SOLELY IN NOAA HEADQUARTERS AT WASHINGTON. SIMILAR JOB CLASSIFICATIONS PREVAIL IN THE CENTER HEADQUARTERS AND THE SEVEN LABORATORIES. TIMS EMPLOYEES WORK IN DIFFERENT JOB CLASSIFICATIONS THAN THOSE FOUND ELSEWHERE IN THE CENTER, BUT, AGAIN, THE SAME CLASSIFICATIONS PREVAIL THROUGHOUT TIMS, WHETHER THE EMPLOYEES ARE LOCATED IN MIAMI, BEAUFORT, NEW ORLEANS, OR GALVESTON. THE RECORD FURTHER REVEALS THAT THERE IS A HIGH DEGREE OF FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION AMONG THE VARIOUS COMPONENTS OF THE CENTER. EACH COMPONENT IS ASSIGNED ONE OR MORE "FOCAL POINTS" OR AREAS OF PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY, AND THEY ARE SUPPORTED BY OTHER COMPONENTS OR BY INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS OF EMPLOYEES IN OTHER COMPONENTS, AS ASSIGNED. FOR EXAMPLE, THE MIAMI LABORATORY HAS ONE FOCAL POINT, OCEANIC PELAGICS MANAGEMENT. IT IS SUPPORTED BY MANAGEMENT, TIMS, AND THE PANAMA CITY, PASCAGOULA, BAY ST. LOUIS AND GALVESTON LABORATORIES. RESEARCH HAS TWO FOCAL POINTS AND IS ASSIGNED SUPPORT FROM MANAGEMENT, TIMS, AND FIVE LABORATORIES. INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES OR GROUPS OF EMPLOYEES THUS ASSIGNED AS SUPPORT ARE GIVEN SPECIFIC PROJECTS BY THE COMPONENT CHARGED WITH A FOCAL POINT. THEY ARE DIRECTED IN THEIR WORK BY THOSE AT THE COMPONENT IN CHARGE OF THE FOCAL POINT, AND THEIR OUTPUT IS EVALUATED BY THAT COMPONENT. THUS, IT APPEARS THAT EMPLOYEES AT EACH OF THE COMPONENTS OF THE CENTER WORK IN CLOSE CONTACT WITH THOSE IN OTHER COMPONENTS EITHER BECAUSE OF THE FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION OF THEIR WORK OR BECAUSE OF ACTUAL EMPLOYEE INTERCHANGE. DURING THE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 1976 TO JULY 1979 THERE WERE ABOUT 45 PERMANENT TRANSFERS OF EMPLOYEES AMONG THE VARIOUS COMPONENTS OF THE SOUTHEAST FISHERIES CENTER. THE MIAMI HEADQUARTERS COMPONENTS PERMANENTLY ACQUIRED 13 EMPLOYEES AND LOST TWO. TIMS ACQUIRED 17 AND LOST NONE, ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT ESTABLISHED WHEN THOSE ACQUISITIONS OCCURRED. THE LABORATORIES, OTHER THAN MIAMI, ACQUIRED 13 AND LOST 23. THE MIAMI LABORATORY ALONE ACQUIRED TWO EMPLOYEES BUT PERMANENTLY LOST 20. IN THE SAME TIME FRAME THERE WERE 20 INSTANCES OF TEMPORARY TRANSFERS. THERE WERE EIGHT TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENTS INTO CENTER HEADQUARTERS AND ONE OUT. SEVEN EMPLOYEES WERE TEMPORARILY ASSIGNED TO TIMS AND NONE WERE ASSIGNED OUT. THE LABORATORIES, OTHER THAN MIAMI, TEMPORARILY ACQUIRED THE SERVICES OF FOUR EMPLOYEES AND LOST 11, AND THE MIAMI LABORATORY TEMPORARILY GAINED ONE EMPLOYEE AND LOST EIGHT. THE RECORD DOES NOT REVEAL THE EXTENT, IF ANY, OF THE INTERCHANGE BETWEEN THE MIAMI LABORATORY CURRENTLY REPRESENTED BY THE PETITIONER AND THE MIAMI EMPLOYEES SOUGHT HEREIN. THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 290 PERMANENT FULLTIME EMPLOYEES IN THE SOUTHEAST FISHERIES CENTER, AND THE MIAMI LABORATORY CONSTITUTES THE SOLE UNIT OF EXCLUSIVE RECOGNITION. ELSEWHERE IN NMFS, THERE IS A HEADQUARTERS-WIDE UNIT IN WASHINGTON, D.C., AND A REGION-WIDE UNIT IN THE NORTHWEST REGION. IN THE NORTHEAST FISHERIES CENTER THERE IS A UNIT OF TWO OUT OF EIGHT LABORATORIES, AND IN THE SOUTHWEST FISHERIES CENTER THERE IS A UNIT CONSISTING OF ONE OF FOUR LABORATORIES. ALTHOUGH THE EMPLOYEES CURRENTLY REPRESENTED BY THE PETITIONER AND THOSE SOUGHT HEREIN WORK IN THE SAME BUILDING AND SHARE SUCH FACILITIES AS A COMMON PARKING LOT AND LUNCHROOM, THE RECORD IS DEVOID OF EVIDENCE THAT THEY SHARE ANY PARTICULAR TERMS OR CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT, AND THUS ANY UNIQUE COMMUNITY OF INTEREST, SEPARATE AND APART FROM OTHER CENTER EMPLOYEES EXCEPT FOR THOSE THAT MIGHT BE IMPLIED FROM A COMMON LOCATION. UNDER ALL THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE AUTHORITY CONCLUDES THAT THE UNIT WHICH THE PETITIONER SEEKS TO REPRESENT IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXCLUSIVE RECOGNITION UNDER SECTION 7112(A) OF THE STATUTE AS IT DOES NOT ENCOMPASS EMPLOYEES WHO SHARE A CLEAR AND IDENTIFIABLE COMMUNITY OF INTEREST SEPARATE AND DISTINCT FROM OTHER EMPLOYEES OF THE ACTIVITY, AND IT WILL NOT PROMOTE EFFECTIVE DEALINGS AND EFFICIENCY OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE AGENCY. THUS, EMPLOYEES WHO WOULD BE INCLUDED IN, AND EMPLOYEES WHO WOULD BE EXCLUDED FROM, THE UNIT SOUGHT PERFORM THE SAME FUNCTIONS, POSSESS ESSENTIALLY THE SAME JOB CLASSIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS, ARE ENGAGED IN COMMON AND INTEGRATED WORK PROJECTS, AND ENJOY COMMON SUPERVISION AND WORKING CONDITIONS. HENCE, THERE IS NO CLEAR AND IDENTIFIABLE COMMUNITY OF INTEREST AMONG THE EMPLOYEES IN THE PROPOSED UNIT, SEPARATE AND DISTINCT FROM THOSE EMPLOYEES WHO WOULD BE EXCLUDED. FURTHER, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE UNIT SOUGHT IS NOT COEXTENSIVE WITH ANY ADMINISTRATIVE COMPONENT OR SUBDIVISION OF THE ACTIVITY. RATHER, THE UNIT SOUGHT WOULD FRAGMENT THE ACTIVITY, AND SEVERAL OF ITS COMPONENTS AS WELL. IN THIS REGARD, THE RECORD DISCLOSES THAT TWO EMPLOYEES FROM THE CHARLESTON LABORATORY WOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE SOUGHT UNIT, BUT ONE EMPLOYEE IN CENTER HEADQUARTERS WOULD BE EXCLUDED; AND, THAT THREE OUT OF FOUR TIMS EMPLOYEES WOULD BE EXCLUDED ON THE BASIS OF GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION ALONE. MOREOVER, BOTH THE ACTIVITY'S PERSONNEL AND LABOR RELATIONS POLICY ARE ESTABLISHED AND IMPLEMENTED ON AN ACTIVITY-WIDE BASIS. UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE AUTHORITY FINDS THAT THE UNIT SOUGHT WOULD NOT PROMOTE EFFECTIVE DEALINGS AND EFFICIENCY OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE AGENCY. ACCORDINGLY, AS THE UNIT SOUGHT HEREIN DOES NOT SATISFY THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN SECTION 7112(A) OF THE STATUTE, THE PETITION WILL BE DISMISSED. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE PETITION IN CASE NO. 4-RO-16 BE, AND IT HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JUNE 27, 1980 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY