[ v03 p301 ]
03:0301(46)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
3 FLRA No. 46 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AFL-CIO, LOCAL 3529 (Labor Organization) and DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY (Activity) Case No. 0-NG-14 DECISION ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY (THE AUTHORITY) PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT STATUTE (5 U.S.C. 7101 ET SEQ.). UNION PROPOSAL THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL AT ISSUE CONTAINED IN A LETTER FROM RONALD D. KING, DIRECTOR, CONTRACT AND APPEALS DIVISION, AFGE TO FREDERICK NEUMAN, DIRECTOR OF THE DCAA, DATED DECEMBER 12, 1978, IS: . . . TO HAVE THE DCAA AUDITOR ROTATION POLICY NOT APPLY TO THE BARGAINING UNIT . . . QUESTION HERE BEFORE THE AUTHORITY THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THE UNION'S PROPOSAL IS OUTSIDE THE AGENCY'S DUTY TO BARGAIN UNDER THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS (FSLMR) STATUTE, AS ALLEGED BY THE AGENCY. THE UNION RAISED A THRESHOLD ISSUE OBJECTING TO THE AUTHORITY'S REQUESTING THE AGENCY TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INITIAL SUBMISSION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED FROM BOTH PARTIES TO COMPLETE THE CASE FILE SINCE NEITHER PARTY IN ITS INITIAL SUBMISSION GAVE AN ACCURATE OR COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT STATUS OF THE PARTIES' DISPUTE. THEREFORE, THE UNION'S OBJECTION CANNOT BE SUSTAINED. CONCLUSION: THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL VIOLATES SECTION 7106(A)(2)(A) OF THE FSLMR STATUTE. /1/ ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2424.10 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, 45 F.R. 3513, THE AGENCY'S ALLEGATION THAT THE DISPUTED PROPOSAL IS NOT WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN IS SUSTAINED. REASONS: THE RECORD BEFORE THE AUTHORITY INDICATES THAT THE AGENCY'S AUDITOR ROTATION POLICY ESTABLISHES A MAXIMUM PERIOD FOR THE CONTINUOUS ASSIGNMENT OF AN AUDITOR AT ONE LOCATION, AFTER WHICH AN AUDITOR WOULD BE SUBJECT TO A CHANGE IN ASSIGNMENT. THE AGENCY MEMORANDUM ESTABLISHING THIS POLICY, IN ESSENCE DESCRIBES SUCH "CHANGES IN ASSIGNMENT" AS CHANGES WITHIN THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE AGENCY, SPECIFICALLY: (1) MOVES (LATERAL OR BY PROMOTION) TO OTHER DUTY STATIONS SUCH AS REASSIGNMENT BETWEEN FAOS, SUBOFFICES, PLA ACTIVITIES AND/OR REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS. (2) MAJOR WORK ASSIGNMENT CHANGES WITH OR WITHOUT CHANGE OF DUTY STATION WHICH COMPLETELY CHANGE THE CONTRACTOR CONTACTS AND WORK RELATIONSHIPS OF THE EMPLOYEE. SOME EXAMPLES ARE, MOVES WITHIN AN FAO BETWEEN MOBILE AUDIT WORK AND PERMANENT OFFICES OR SUBOFFICES, BETWEEN MOBILE AUDIT TEAMS INVOLVING A COMPLETELY NEW GROUP OF CONTRACTORS, AND CHANGE OF FAO COGNIZANCE FOR PERSONNEL AT REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS LEVEL. THE UNION'S PROPOSAL ESSENTIALLY WOULD PRECLUDE THE AGENCY FROM APPLYING THIS MANDATORY REASSIGNMENT POLICY TO BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES. THE AGENCY CONTENDS, INSOFAR AS IS RELEVANT HEREIN, THAT THE PROPOSAL VIOLATES SECTION 7106(A)(2)(A) OF THE STATUTE. IN VIEW OF THE DECISION THAT THE PROPOSAL VIOLATES SECTION 7106 OF THE STATUTE, THE AUTHORITY FINDS IT UNNECESSARY TO CONSIDER THE AGENCY'S ADDITIONAL CONTENTIONS. SECTION 7106(A)(2)(A) RESERVES TO MANAGEMENT THE RIGHT TO "ASSIGN . . . EMPLOYEES IN THE AGENCY." THE AUTHORITY RECENTLY CONSIDERED THE MEANING OF THE TERM "ASSIGN . . . EMPLOYEES" IN AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND AIR FORCE LOGISTICS COMMAND, WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO, NO. O-NG-40, 2 FLRA NO. 77 (JAN. 31, 1980), STATING AT 10: THE RIGHT TO ASSIGN EMPLOYEES IN THE AGENCY UNDER SECTION 7106(A)(2)(A) OF THE STATUTE IS MORE THAN MERELY THE RIGHT TO DECIDE TO ASSIGN AN EMPLOYEE TO A POSITION. AN AGENCY CHOOSES TO ASSIGN AN EMPLOYEE TO A POSITION SO THAT THE WORK OF THAT POSITION WILL BE DONE. UNDER SECTION 7106(A)(2)(A) OF THE STATUTE, THE AGENCY RETAINS DISCRETION AS TO THE PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS OF THE WORK OF THE POSITION, I.E., THE QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS NEEDED TO DO THE WORK, AS WELL AS SUCH JOB-RELATED INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS AS JUDGMENT AND RELIABILITY. THEREFORE, THE RIGHT TO ASSIGN AN EMPLOYEE TO A POSITION INCLUDES THE DISCRETION TO DETERMINE WHICH EMPLOYEE WILL BE ASSIGNED. THUS, THE AUTHORITY HAS DETERMINED THAT A PROPOSAL WHICH DIVESTS MANAGEMENT OF ITS DISCRETION TO ASSIGN EMPLOYEES WOULD BE IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 7106(A)(2)(A) OF THE STATUTE. IN THIS INSTANCE, MANAGEMENT'S RIGHT TO ASSIGN IS MANIFESTED IN ITS MANDATORY REASSIGNMENT POLICY. THE PRESENT PROPOSAL WOULD PROHIBIT MANAGEMENT FROM APPLYING THE POLICY TO BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES AND, THEREFORE, WOULD PROHIBIT MANAGEMENT FROM CHANGING THE ASSIGNMENT OF AUDITORS WHO HAVE COMPLETED DESIGNATED PERIODS OF CONTINUOUS ASSIGNMENT AT SINGLE LOCATIONS. SINCE THE PROPOSAL THEREFORE CONSTITUTES A BAR TO MANAGEMENT'S MAKING ROTATIONAL ASSIGNMENTS WITHIN THE BARGAINING UNIT, IT CLEARLY DIVESTS MANAGEMENT OF ANY DISCRETION TO ASSIGN EMPLOYEES IN THAT REGARD, AND THUS VIOLATES SECTION 7106(A)(2)(A). IN SO DECIDING, THE AUTHORITY NOTES THAT PROCEDURES WHICH MANAGEMENT WILL OBSERVE IN EXERCISING ITS AUTHORITY TO REASSIGN, AS WELL AS APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS FOR EMPLOYEES ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY SUCH REASSIGNMENT, WOULD BE PROPER MATTERS FOR NEGOTIATION UNDER SECTION 7106(B)(2) AND (3) OF THE STATUTE. ACCORDINGLY, THE PROPOSAL AT ISSUE VIOLATES SECTION 7106(A)(2)(A) OF THE STATUTE, AND, THEREFORE, IS NOT WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., MAY 30, 1980 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY /1/ SECTION 7106(A)(2)(A) OF THE STATUTE PROVIDES: SEC. 7106. MANAGEMENT RIGHTS (A) SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION, NOTHING IN THIS CHAPTER SHALL AFFECT THE AUTHORITY OF ANY MANAGEMENT OFFICIAL OF ANY AGENCY-- . . . . (2) IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS-- (A) TO HIRE, ASSIGN, DIRECT, LAYOFF, AND RETAIN EMPLOYEES IN THE AGENCY(.)