[ v06 p498 ]
06:0498(95)RO
The decision of the Authority follows:
6 FLRA No. 95 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NAVAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CENTER, WARD CIRCLE Activity and NAVTELCOM UNIT LOCAL NO. 1, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO Petitioner Case No. 3-RO-46 DECISION AND ORDER UPON A PETITION DULY FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 7111(B) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE), A HEARING WAS HELD BEFORE A HEARING OFFICER OF THE AUTHORITY. /1/ THE AUTHORITY HAS REVIEWED THE HEARING OFFICER'S RULINGS MADE AT THE HEARING AND FINDS THAT THEY ARE FREE FROM PREJUDICIAL ERROR. /2/ THE RULINGS ARE HEREBY AFFIRMED. UPON THE ENTIRE RECORD IN THIS CASE, INCLUDING POST-HEARING BRIEFS FILED BY THE PARTIES, /3/ THE AUTHORITY FINDS: AFGE SEEKS TO REPRESENT A UNIT OF ALL GENERAL SCHEDULE (GS) EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NAVAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CENTER, WARD CIRCLE (THE ACTIVITY), EXCLUDING ALL PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES, MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS, SUPERVISORS AND EMPLOYEES DESCRIBED IN SECTION 7112(B)(2), (3), (4), (6) AND (7) OF THE STATUTE. /4/ THE ACTIVITY AND OPM ASSERT THAT THE AUTHORITY HAS NO JURISDICTION TO PROCESS THIS CASE BECAUSE OF PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER 12171 (44 FED.REG. 66566(1979)) ISSUED PURSUANT TO SECTION 7103(B) OF THE STATUTE /5/ WHICH PERMITS THE PRESIDENT TO EXCLUDE "ANY AGENCY OR SUBDIVISION THEREOF" FROM COVERAGE UNDER THE STATUTE ON NATIONAL SECURITY GROUNDS. EXECUTIVE ORDER 12171 SECTION 1-101 PROVIDES, IN PERTINENT PART: "THE AGENCIES OR SUBDIVISIONS THEREOF SET FORTH IN SECTION 1-2 OF THIS ORDER ARE HEREBY DETERMINED TO HAVE AS A PRIMARY FUNCTION INTELLIGENCE, COUNTERINTELLIGENCE, INVESTIGATIVE, OR NATIONAL SECURITY WORK. . . . THE AGENCIES OR SUBDIVISIONS THEREOF SET FORTH IN SECTION 1-2 OF THE ORDER ARE HEREBY EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE UNDER CHAPTER 71 OF TITLE 5 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE." EXECUTIVE ORDER 12171 SECTION 1-205 PROVIDES FOR THE EXCLUSION OF "AGENCIES OR SUBDIVISIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE" INCLUDING "(G) UNITS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF EMPLOYEES ENGAGED IN THE OPERATION, REPAIR, AND/OR MAINTENANCE OF "OFF LINE" OR "ON LINE" CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT" AND "(H) UNITS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF EMPLOYEES OF NAVAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACTIVITIES IN POSITIONS WHICH REQUIRE A CRYPTOGRAPHIC AUTHORIZATION." WHERE THE PRESIDENT HAS SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED AN AGENCY OR ACTIVITY FROM COVERAGE UNDER THE STATUTE BY ISSUING AN EXECUTIVE ORDER, THE AUTHORITY IS CLEARLY WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO PROCESS A REPRESENTATION PETITION. /6/ WHERE, HOWEVER, THE PRESIDENT ISSUES AN EXECUTIVE ORDER WHICH DOES NOT SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDE AN ENTIRE AGENCY OR ACTIVITY FROM COVERAGE BUT INSTEAD EXCLUDES PARTICULAR GROUPINGS OF EMPLOYEES, AS IN THE INSTANT CASE, THE AUTHORITY MUST DETERMINE WHETHER, AS A THRESHOLD FACTUAL MATTER, THE EXECUTIVE ORDER IS APPLICABLE TO THE EMPLOYEES IN QUESTION. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE EXECUTIVE ORDER APPLIES, THEN THE AUTHORITY IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO PROCESS A REPRESENTATION PETITION WITH RESPECT TO THOSE EMPLOYEES. ACCORDINGLY, WE NOW TURN TO A CONSIDERATION OF THAT ISSUE. THE ACTIVITY IS ONE OF SIX TELECOMMUNICATIONS CENTERS WITHIN THE NAVAL COMMUNICATION UNIT, WASHINGTON, D.C. THE ACTIVITY'S MISSION IS TO MANAGE, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THOSE FACILITIES, SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES NECESSARY TO PROVIDE REQUISITE COMMUNICATION FOR THE COMMAND, OPERATIONAL CONTROL AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. IT IS A SEPARATE ENTITY WITH ITS OWN ORGANIZATION, AND IS PART OF A LARGER ORGANIZATION ONLY IN THE SENSE OF BEING WITHIN A CHAIN OF COMMAND. IN THIS REGARD, THE ACTIVITY HAS ITS OWN IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FOR FINANCIAL, PERSONNEL AND ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS, INCLUDING ITS OWN ALLOCATION OF CIVILIAN CEILINGS AND ITS OWN ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE. THE ACTIVITY OPERATES CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT WHICH PROVIDES SECURITY FOR ITS OWN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AS WELL AS THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF THE VARIOUS COMMANDS THAT IT SERVICES. THERE ARE 17 INDIVIDUALS ENGAGED IN THE ACTIVITY'S OPERATIONS: 13 ARE MILITARY PERSONNEL; THE OTHER 4 ARE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES WHO COMPRISE THE UNIT SOUGHT HEREIN. ALL FOUR OF THESE EMPLOYEES ARE ENGAGED IN THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF "OFF LINE" AND "ON LINE" CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT ON A DAILY BASIS. THE AMOUNT OF SUCH WORK VARIES ACCORDING TO HOW EFFICIENTLY THE EQUIPMENT IS OPERATING ON A PARTICULAR DAY. MINOR REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE ARE PERFORMED BY THE FOUR EMPLOYEES, WHILE MAJOR REPAIRS ARE DONE ELSEWHERE. AT ONE TIME, ALL THE EMPLOYEES' POSITIONS REQUIRED A FORMAL CRYPTOGRAPHIC AUTHORIZATION; HOWEVER, SUCH FORMAL AUTHORIZATIONS ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED. INSTEAD, ALL FOUR EMPLOYEES NOW ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A TOP SECRET CLEARANCE AND A "NEED-TO-KNOW" FOR ACCESS TO AREAS WHERE CRYPTOGRAPHIC INFORMATION CAN BE VIEWED. BASED ON THE FOREGOING, THE AUTHORITY FINDS THAT THE ACTIVITY IS A SEPARATE ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT OR SUBDIVISION WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, AND THAT THE FOUR EMPLOYEES WITHIN THE PROPOSED UNIT ARE ENGAGED IN THE OPERATION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF "OFF LINE" AND "ON LINE" CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT. ACCORDINGLY, THE ACTIVITY IS EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE OF THE STATUTE PURSUANT TO SECTION 7103(B) AND EXECUTIVE ORDER 12171, SECTION 1-205(G), /7/ AND AFGE'S PETITION MUST THEREFORE BE DISMISSED. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE PETITION IN CASE NO. 3-RO-46 BE, AND IT HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., SEPTEMBER 4, 1981 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY --------------- FOOTNOTES: --------------- /1/ THE PETITION HEREIN, FILED BY NAVTELCOM UNIT LOCAL NO. 1, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO (AFGE), WAS INITIALLY DISMISSED BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ON THE GROUND THAT THE UNIT SOUGHT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROPRIATE UNIT WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 7112 OF THE STATUTE BECAUSE IT IS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF EMPLOYEES WHO WERE EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE UNDER THE STATUTE BY EXECUTIVE ORDER 12171, SECTION 1-205(G) AND (H). ON JULY 23, 1980, PURSUANT TO A TIMELY REQUEST FOR REVIEW FILED BY AFGE, THE AUTHORITY REMANDED THE CASE TO THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR FOR A HEARING SO AS TO DEVELOP A FULL AND COMPLETE RECORD. /2/ AFGE, IN ITS POST-HEARING BRIEF, CONTENDS THAT THE HEARING OFFICER IMPROPERLY SUSTAINED THE ACTIVITY'S OBJECTIONS TO AFGE'S QUESTIONS CONCERNING WHETHER UNIT EMPLOYEES ARE ENGAGED IN THE OPERATION, REPAIR AND/OR MAINTENANCE OF "ON LINE" AND "OFF LINE" CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT, AN ESSENTIAL FACTUAL QUESTION HEREIN. THE HEARING OFFICER FOUND THE QUESTIONS IMPROPER AS TO FORM. HOWEVER, THE RECORD INDICATES THAT THE HEARING OFFICER SUBSEQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS OF THREE WITNESSES WITH RESPECT THERETO, SO THAT EVIDENCE IN THIS REGARD IS IN THE RECORD AND HAS BEEN CONSIDERED BY THE AUTHORITY. ACCORDINGLY, AFGE WAS NOT PREJUDICED BY THE HEARING OFFICER'S RULING. /3/ PURSUANT TO PERMISSION GRANTED BY THE AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 2429.9 OF ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS, THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT (OPM) PARTICIPATED AS AMICUS CURIAE IN THIS PROCEEDING AND FILED A POST-HEARING BRIEF. /4/ THE UNIT IS SET FORTH AS AMENDED AT THE HEARING. /5/ SECTION 7103(B) PROVIDES, IN PERTINENT PART, AS FOLLOWS: SEC. 7103. DEFINITIONS; APPLICATION . . . . (B)(1) THE PRESIDENT MAY ISSUE AN ORDER EXCLUDING ANY AGENCY OR SUBDIVISION THEREOF FROM COVERAGE UNDER THIS CHAPTER IF THE PRESIDENT DETERMINES THAT-- (A) THE AGENCY OR SUBDIVISION HAS AS A PRIMARY FUNCTION INTELLIGENCE, COUNTERINTELLIGENCE, INVESTIGATIVE, OR NATIONAL SECURITY WORK, AND (B) THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER CANNOT BE APPLIED TO THAT AGENCY OR SUBDIVISION IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH NATIONAL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS AND CONSIDERATIONS. /6/ SEE, E.G., AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 2118 AND DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, ALBUQUERQUE OPERATIONS, LOS ALAMOS AREA OFFICE, 2 FLRA 916(1980); U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS, BOSTON DISTRICT OFFICE, CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT, 3 FLRA NO. 4(1980). /7/ INASMUCH AS THE ACTIVITY IS EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE OF THE STATUTE BY SECTION 1-205(G), THE AUTHORITY FINDS IT UNNECESSARY TO DECIDE WHETHER SECTION 1-205(H) PROVIDES AN ADDITIONAL BASIS FOR SUCH EXCLUSION.